Monthly Archives: June 2009

NetApp and EMC in bidding war for Data Domain

0
Filed under External Articles, General

Forbes has an article today about the run-up in the stock price of Data Domain.  EMC and NetApp are the strong suitors here.  Each sees a tremendous value to the technology and IP housed at Data Domain.  Mostly known for de-duplication, Data Domain is a major player in backup, archiving and disaster recovery.

Excerpt from the Forbes/AP piece:

Investors bet that a higher offer is coming in the bidding war for Data Domain Inc., sending shares of the data storage company soaring Tuesday.
NetApp Inc., a Sunnyvale, Calif., company, offered $25 per share in cash and stock for Digital Domain on May 20, pegging the total value of the deal at $1.5 billion. Hopkinton, Mass.-based EMC Corp. ( EMCnews - people ) stepped in Monday with an all-cash offer of $30 per share, or $1.8 billion.

That is a lot of money people!  It should underscore the importance of data management and backing up.  We will also write an article for later about de-duplication.

Many Small and Mid-Sized Companies with Continuity Plans Still Ill-Prepared

0
Filed under External Articles

This might not come as a surprise, but a lot of companies have a false sense of security and in some cases, the know they are deficient.  This article has an interesting take and some stats:

Study Reveals Businesses are Deficient in Disaster Preparedness

Many Small and Mid-Sized Companies with Continuity Plans Still Ill-Prepared

CHARLOTTE, N.C.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–According to a recent survey, small and mid-sized businesses are woefully unprepared for disasters and misled by existing data backup plans.

The 2009 Disaster Recovery & Business Continuity Survey was conducted by Agility Recovery Solutions and Hughes Marketing Group. More than 700 business owners and executives throughout North America participated. Among the highlights:

Data backup brings a false sense of security.

  • 94% of companies have formal data backup plans.
  • While 75% of companies say they can have their employees back to work within days of a disaster, only:
    • 28% have access to alternative office space.
    • 41% have access to mobile office space.
    • 54% could acquire temporary office equipment.
    • 57% have access to power generators.

Small and medium-sized businesses are woefully unprepared for disasters.

  • 90% of smaller companies (<100 employees) surveyed spend less than one day per month maintaining their continuity plans.
  • One in five (22%) spend no time maintaining their plans.
  • Comparatively, 20% of larger companies (>100 employees) spend more than 10 days per month on their continuity plans.

Responses indicate a difference between saying the “right thing” and taking action.

  • Gaining C-level buy-in is a challenge. Regardless of business size, survey results show many companies have difficulties getting C-level executives to embrace the importance of continuity planning.
  • Although 67% of respondents feel an effective business continuity plan is paramount to company success, only 53% think their company’s management team feels the same way.

“A data backup plan is not the same as a disaster recovery plan,” said Bob Boyd, chief executive of Agility Recovery. “The best data in the world is useless if you can’t make use of it. Businesses must take measures to ensure employees can return to work immediately after a disaster. Without alternate plans, you’re business will pay the ultimate price.”

Complete survey results are available at www.AgilityRecovery.com.

About Agility Recovery Solutions

Agility Recovery offers on-site disaster recovery and business continuity services for small and mid-sized businesses throughout North America. If you have a disaster, Agility will deliver the power, technology, space and/or connectivity elements needed to recover. Visit www.AgilityRecovery.com for more information.

What’s in your disaster recovery plan? by Dan Blacharski

0
Filed under External Articles

I like it, this guy is elevating the conversation.  He is making the excelent suggesttion that people should be thinking about more than just backing up.  People (and companies) should have an actual disaster recovery plan.

What’s in your disaster recovery plan? by Dan Blacharski

Last week, I wrote about disaster recovery, and what to do when disaster strikes and your company’s main facility is inaccessible. An old-fashioned phone tree and an alternate physical location, perhaps in a neighboring town, is just the beginning, though.

Some companies, especially with sensitive operations, do contract with an office/facilities management company for emergency back-up physical office space, but there is another alternative, and that’s to “go virtual.” In fact, even during ordinary times, there are presently many smaller companies that operate purely on a virtual basis with no physical headquarters. Doing so would be a little trickier for a larger organization, but it’s very possible in an emergency. Having a back-up plan to “go virtual” during a disaster may just be the best way to go. For one thing, if there’s a city-wide disaster, it’s very possible that even your back-up physical office could be inaccessible. Roads might be impassable, and it may be difficult for employees to gather anywhere. Employees may be stuck at home. But there’s one thing that almost all of your employees will have in common, and that’s that they have Internet access at home. Assuming that Internet service is still available, operating remotely could solve the business continuity problem in a disaster situation.

This does require some advance planning, however, and just advising your staff to “log in from home” is inadequate. You’ll need to ensure that everyone has remote software, or immediate access to it. It may not be necessary to provision remote access software ahead of time to everybody of course, just make sure everyone understands where to find the download or how to access the VPN securely from home.

And the biggest challenge is the same challenge faced by companies implementing remote teleworking in general, and that’s to ensure that the computers being used are compliant with internal policies (e.g., up to date antivirus software, etc.). And of course, remote authentication and authorization needs to be stringently applied, preferably with a two-factor authentication system with a granular system of authorization, so that each employee gains access to what they need, but not what they don’t need. And besides being compliant with your own internal policies, you’ll still be liable to comply with any legislative compliance mandates as well, so the same precautions and procedures will still apply.
Read the original and take a poll.