Backing up Media files
There have been a number of devices in the past year that provide streaming media “home server” type options. A really interesting one is the Pogoplug, which released some new features today. Among them: streaming to XBOX 360 and PS3, and the ability to backup media files. It brings to mind the question of the worth of backing up media. Pictures, sure, but mp3s, movies, etc? It would be nice if there were, ahem, some sort of perpetual license that precluded the need to back these up. I wonder about the global cost and resources eaten up by having millions of copies of the same songs floating around, clogging network drives, being backed up, etc. When LaLa first came out, it seemed like a solution. But when Apple bought it, well, that was the last I’ve heard of it.
Also in the news today: Exagrid appliances are validated to backup and provide dedupe for NetBackup.
Also, Backup Exec 2010 was released last week, check out this review…
And last but not least, The Back-up Plan Movie, Release Date 4/23/2010 – check out the blog about it
I guess “The” should really be “A” Backup Blog
Clearly, I am not the only one interested in backup or even blogging about it. So…I guess it is not perfectly accurate to say “The Backup Blog” – in fact, there is another blog, from Scott Waterhouse, that is called “The Backup Blog” – and he even works for VMWare. So, he gets enterprise credit, where I may not.
Anyway, he does a good job, so check out articles like this one about de-dupe at “The Backup Blog” at Scott’s Typepad blog site.
Fileslinger review of Cloudberry Online Backup
Fileslinger has a great and thorough review of Clouberry Online Backup…which is not actually an online backup service. It is a slick and well designed client that helps the end user do their backups…and the destination is the Amazon S3 storage cloud. So, you buy this software, and then you also pay the (rather small) fees to Amazon for storage. Check out the article, it is well written and quite useful, as usual.
I do wonder sometimes about the business model in situations like this. I would personally lean towards distributing the software for free and wrapping the S3 service into monthly billing…it may have some more issues in terms of collection, but recurring income is better than 1 time income.
At $30 a pop, if you sold 100 licenses you’d bring in $3000.
If you were able to up charge the S3 service by about $1 a month, the same 100 customers would net $100 a month. But, over 3 years, you’d bring in $3600…and possibly much more if their data requirements expanded over time. Free downloads also remove the initial obstacle of purchasing software. This is the model Vembu is following for their @home service. This is NOT the model that Mozy or Carbonite follow….their models make almost no long-term sense, given that unlimited use generally means that costs will get bigger while revenue stays flat…so i guess they hope to make a lot of profit early on?
All that said, the Cloudberry Online Backup software does look really solid, and they have other offerings that also make use (and sense) of the sometimes confusing S3 interface.
Backup News Roundup, March 2010
The Computer Technology Review posted an article by Eran Farajun of Asigra about backing up via the cloud. Asigra, not surprisingly, offers cloud-related backup and recovery services. Itdoes point out that it doesn’t really make sense to just use your old backup model and point it to the cloud or even offsite. Thearticle also also points at virtualization as an important recover path.
NovaStor has launched a SaaS aimed at the end user. Their new Storageline.com is a site that provides free local backup software and connects you to their network of Offsite backup providers, where you can pay for remote backups. the only problems….well, for one, Vembu announced pretty much this model with Vembu @ Home a while back, and two, NovaStor is too expensive…most of their resellers are charging in the $2.50/gig per month range. MSPs and Resllers through The Backup Plan can beat that.
Google has announced that all Google Apps customers now benefit from a totay top-notch and enterprise-level backup system, Google Advanced Backup, which is how they can guarantee 99.9% uptime. Makes you wonder, though, if they announced this today…what did they have before this?
Is a local disk really a backup?
I have met a lot of people who, when asked about their backup preparedness, shrug the question off saying, “Well, i backup to an external hard drive.” Increasingly, folks buy the external drives and home NAS products that are designed to assist with backups (like the Apple TimeMachine). HOWEVER, backing up to a single, local hard drive is not really backing up…it is making a second copy. Consider what might happen if your external drive were to fail? Or, even worse, if you had a disaster, like a fire, that charred your home computer and that external drive?!
As if to underscore this point, thousands of users have had issues with their Apple TimeMachines. The devices themselves suffer from (typical) Apple heat issues (some folks out there have suggested that aesthetics are ranked about all else, and that has been cited as the reason for the lap-scorching properties of many generations of MacBook Pros). Well, CPUs, Power Supplies and Hard Drives hate heat, and tend to fail when operated outside of their normal range. Initially Apple rejected warranty claims unless the user had applecare on their computer as well, but they have since extended the warranty to replace these failed TimeMachines. But replacement doesn’t get you your data, and so this really illustrates the value of having more than one method of backup. And I, of course, would recommend that at least 1 of those methods should be offsite!
Some interesting links:
http://appletimecapsule.me/
http://timecapsuledead.org/
What’s killing Apple’s Time Capsules after 18 months?
